Wightman v. Wightman
Citations
- 45 Ill. 167
Syllabus
<p>1. Chancery—process of court—attachment for contempt. A court of chancery has power to issue attachments for contempts in refusing to obey orders made conformable to law.</p> <p>2. Same—imprisonment for debt. The commitment of a defendant for contempt for refusing to pay alimony, is not an imprisonment for debt, from which he can claim exemption under the 15th section of article 8 of the Constitution.</p> <p>3. A court of chancery has power, in addition to making a decree for alimony a lien on the lands of a defendant, to enforce the decree by attachment for contempt, and if the defendant remains contumacious, may also sequestrate his real and personal property, as a means of enforcing performance of the decree.</p> <p>4. The act of June 22, 1852, provides means of relief to a defendant committed for any contempt of court in not performing any order or decree for the payment of money.</p>
Judges: Beeese
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Craig v. CraigIllinois Supreme Court· 1896-11-10· cited 58×
- Lester v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1890-01-21· cited 57×
- Walton v. DevelingIllinois Supreme Court· 1871-09-15· cited 51×
- Barclay v. BarclayIllinois Supreme Court· 1900-02-19· cited 51×
- O'Callaghan v. O'CallaghanIllinois Supreme Court· 1873-09-15· cited 35×
- Wade v. WadeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1951-12-26· cited 33×
- In Re Marriage of HilkovitchAppellate Court of Illinois· 1984-05-24· cited 33×
- Schooley v. SchooleySupreme Court of Iowa· 1918-10-25· cited 32×
- Shaffner v. ShaffnerIllinois Supreme Court· 1904-10-24· cited 28×
- In re PurvineFifth Circuit· 1899-06-28· cited 25×
- Welty v. WeltyIllinois Supreme Court· 1902-02-21· cited 24×
- Manning v. Mercantile Securities Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1909-12-22· cited 22×
- Chapman v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Missouri· 1917-02-02· cited 22×
- Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1912-04-19· cited 21×
- Mesirow v. MesirowIllinois Supreme Court· 1931-10-23· cited 16×
- Barclay v. BarclayIllinois Supreme Court· 1900-02-21· cited 16×
- Villa v. Corte de Distrito de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1933-12-11· cited 16×
- Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1883-12-15· cited 12×
- Factor v. FactorAppellate Court of Illinois· 1975-04-07· cited 11×
- In re SalkeyN.D. Illinois· 1875-01-09· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.