Wigginton & Sweeney v. Bruce's Guardian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the defendants’ argument that plaintiffs cannot invoke Title VII or Section 1981 to challenge their visa practices
• denying motion to dismiss Section 1981 claim where “the plaintiffs are alleging that Caucasian and South Asian races are distinct, and that the defendant’s failure to hire, promote, or retain was due to the fact that the plaintiffs are not of the South Asian race.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).