Skip to main content
· 5/13/1976

Wife F. v. Husband F.

Citations

  • 358 A.2d 714
  • 1976 Del. LEXIS 421

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that § 1446(b)(3) “seems 28 to require a greater level of certainty or that the facts supporting removability be 1 stated unequivocally”
  • stating that the facts that demonstrate removability must be stated “clearly” and “unequivocally” before 30-day clock begins
  • stating that the facts that demonstrate removability must be stated “clearly” and “unequivocally” before 30-day clock begins
  • noting that there is a “thirty-day deadline to remove a case to federal court” (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)
  • extending Harris’s rule to removal based on the “federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1442”
  • distinguishing “facts sufficient to allow removal with facts sufficient to require removal within thirty days”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duffy, Herrmann, McNeilly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.