· 5/13/1976
Wife F. v. Husband F.
Citations
- 358 A.2d 714
- 1976 Del. LEXIS 421
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that § 1446(b)(3) “seems 28 to require a greater level of certainty or that the facts supporting removability be 1 stated unequivocally”
- stating that the facts that demonstrate removability must be stated “clearly” and “unequivocally” before 30-day clock begins
- stating that the facts that demonstrate removability must be stated “clearly” and “unequivocally” before 30-day clock begins
- noting that there is a “thirty-day deadline to remove a case to federal court” (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)
- extending Harris’s rule to removal based on the “federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1442”
- distinguishing “facts sufficient to allow removal with facts sufficient to require removal within thirty days”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duffy, Herrmann, McNeilly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.