Skip to main content
· 2/9/2005

Wiest v. E-Fense, Inc.

Citations

  • 356 F. Supp. 2d 604
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3474
  • 2005 WL 464591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because Plaintiff alleges that the website in question is controlled from Defendant E–Fense, Inc.’s corporate headquarters located in Virginia, and the allegedly defamatory statements were published on this website, Virginia law applies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.