Wiersma v. Niemann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that neither state nor federal equal protection concerns prevented the state from separately classifying “supervisory employees” as distinct from “managerial employees” to ensure that the state has the undivided loyalty of its top-level personnel
• holding that neither state nor federal equal protection concerns prevented the state from separately classifying \supervisory employees\ as distinct from \managerial employees\ to ensure that the state has the undivided loyalty of its top-level personnel
• noting that under § 5-270 [b] and [¶] supervisory employees are eligible for collective bargaining
• noting that under § 5-270[b] and [f] supervisory employees are eligible for collective bargaining
• “[c]ivil stat utes . . . may survive a vagueness challenge by a lesser degree of specificity than in criminal statutes” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).