· 4/23/1992
Wiener v. Polaroid Corp.
Citations
- 790 F. Supp. 363
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6098
- 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,596
- 59 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1621
- 1992 WL 91495
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring for the fourth element “that plaintiff show that the employer’s decision ‘occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference’ of discrimination” (quoting Pena v. Brattleboro Retreat, 702 F.2d 322, 324 (2d Cir. 1983))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tauro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.