Skip to main content
· 10/27/1995

Wiener v. Bloomfield

Citations

  • 901 F. Supp. 771
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15986
  • 1995 WL 633527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding violation where debt eollec tor used the language “Summons” and “Summons and complaint pursuant to CPLR 312-A” in caption of document
  • granting a plaintiff $350.00 in statutory damages for multiple violations of the Act because plaintiff neither pleaded nor proved actual damages
  • granting summary judgment for plaintiff under § 1692e where debt collector sent the consumer copies of summons and complaint, captioned for an improper venue, implying that papers had been or were about to be filed in court unless the debtor responded by the deadline
  • “the Act prohibits also the use of documents that merely “simulate” documents authorized by a court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.