Wiel v. Curtis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a dismissal without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is a final decision under § 1291
• noting that a dismissal without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is a final decision under § 1291
• stating that a dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction does not fall within the Borelli rule
• facial challenge to subject matter jurisdiction looks to whether complaint allegations, assumed to be true, “allege facts sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the district court” (cleaned up)
• ALJ’s “Decision Approving Settlement” was appealable under the circumstances; “We consider a party to be ‘aggrieved by the findings and decision’ of an ALJ when they articulate a challenge to the ALJ’s basis for entry of a final judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).