Wiederman v. Verschleiser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that testimony rebutting the defendant's claim that the indictment was not returned in open court was sufficient even though the court's minutes failed to show the return of the indictment
• holding that testimony rebutting the defendant’s claim that the indictment was not returned in open court was sufficient even though the court’s minutes failed to show the return of the indictment
• evidence presented at the plea hearing showed the indictment had been returned by the grand jury bailiff and received by the clerk in open court, despite the omission of that fact from the minutes for the term of court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).