Wiedenhoft v. City of Michigan City

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that person who owned no property in area of urban renewal project, did not reside in area, and did not occupy any property in area was not “aggrieved”
• the alleged “aggrieved” party must show a detriment particular to himself as distinguished from the general detriment theoretically shared by all property owners in the governmental unit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).