Wieboldt v. Metz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the purchaser’s “given role was not essentially ministerial, but truly active and discretionary” and “gave him virtually unfettered control, a situation which is irreconcilable . . . with Howey’s definition of an investment contract”
• concluding that the purchaser’s “given role was not essentially ministerial, but truly active and discretionary” and “gave him virtually unfettered control, a situation which is irreconcilable . . . with Howey’s definition of an investment contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).