Skip to main content
· 11/5/2020

Widok v. Estate of Wolf

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 5178

Syllabus

Dismiss strike affidavit deposition evidence summary judgment estate will probate jurisdiction contract statute of frauds consideration assent inheritance promises oral undue influence. The trial court did not err in dismissing the plaintiff's complaint against the beneficiaries of an estate. However, the trial court erred, in part, in granting summary judgment in favor of the estate where genuine issues of material fact remain regarding the existence and enforceability of an oral contract, the application of the equitable principles of an implied contract for services rendered, and whether the decedent interfered with an expectation of inheritance. In addition, there remain genuine issues of material fact regarding whether the decedent's financial advisor exercised undue influence over the decedent based on his participation in the interference with an expectation of inheritance.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing specific language of letter and determining that letter “contain[ed] no demand for royalties which would satisfy the requirements of [Article 137].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: E.T. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.