Skip to main content
· 6/22/1987

Widmer v. Widmer

Citations

  • 292 Ark. 486
  • 731 S.W.2d 209
  • 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff’s inverse condemnation claim was collateral attack on earlier decision by County that proposed development must meet new zoning regulations
  • plaintiff’s inverse condemnation claim was collateral attack on earlier decision by County that proposed development must meet new zoning regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Purtle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.