Widmark v. Northrup King Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a customer list was not a trade secret because the customers “were readily ascertainable” and there was no evidence of efforts to keep customers’ identities a secret
• finding that “Northrup never actually agreed to forego an immediate action on Widmark’s account if it became overdue in exchange for a late charge,” in determining there was no forbearance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).