Widdall v. Hogan
Citations
- 70 Pa. Super. 78
- 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 175
Syllabus
<p>Contract — Parol contract — Written contract — Evidence — Case for jury.</p> <p>On an issue to determine what was due on a judgment where it appears that the plaintiff relied on a parol contract, although there was a written contract between the parties, a verdict and judgment for plaintiff will be sustained where there is ample evidence to support the plaintiff’s contention that a parol contract had been entered into, the subject-matter of which was different from that embraced in the written contract, and his theory is supported by the undoubted fact that payments had been made by defendant in different amounts from those specified in the written agreement.</p>
Judges: Head, Henderson, Kephart, Oready, Porter, Trexler, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.