Wickliffe v. Sunrise Hospital, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in evaluating a SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 10 (0
• holding that violations of the law-of-the-case doctrine constitute reversible error
• noting that each party is “ ‘entitled to have the jury instructed on all of his theories of the case that are supported by the pleadings and the evidence’ ” (emphasis added) (quoting Rocky Mt. Produce v. Johnson, 78 Nev. 44, 52, 369 P.2d 198, 202 (1962))
• reassigning on remand to avoid an appearance of partiality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).