Whyte v. Blair

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the party claiming the benefit of an unsolemnized marriage” must show “that at some point mutual consent was given”
• involving participation of insurance company in case in which putative husband tried to establish common-law marriage to insured
• involving participation of insurance company in case in which putative husband tried to establish common-law marriage to insured
• describing the consent required as consent “to be married” and to “assume all marital responsibilities”
• \A couple may not enter and exit a marriage for simple financial convenience.\
• \A couple may not enter and exit a marriage for simple financial convenience.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).