Whorton v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the 180 day provision of § 2000e-5(e)(l) controls in cases concerning WMATA, which enjoys sovereign immunity
• explaining that hostile work environment “claims must arise from ‘the administrative investigation that can [be] reasonably expected to follow the charge of discrimination”
• dismissing a claim of hostile work environment based upon the 27 plaintiff’s race where the asserted incidents involved repeated non-selections and denial of training
• collecting cases in which denials of training and non-selection were insufficient to state a claim for a hostile work environment
• collecting cases in which denials of training were insufficient to state a claim for a hostile work environment
• finding plaintiff exhausted hostile work environment claim where her EEOC charge said that she was “subject to a continuous pattern of discrimination, harassment, and retaliation” from her peers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).