Whorton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that payments like these, coming from the Purchase of Evidence/Purchase of Information accounts of the DEA, “can be made or obligated in advance”
• “Ratification thus requires not only that there be some conduct or inaction constituting acquiescence, but that the acquiescence must be knowing.”
• “Ratification thus requires not only that there be some conduct or inaction constituting acquiescence, but that the acquiescence must be knowing.”
• “Ratification thus requires not only that there be some conduct or inaction constituting acquiescence, but that the acquiescence must be knowing.”
• “Ratification thus requires not only that there be some conduct or inaction constituting acquiescence, but that the acquiescence must be knowing.”
• ratification requires “not only that there be some conduct or inaction [by the CO] constituting acquiescence, but that the acquiescence must be knowing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).