Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 2/28/2007

Whorton v. Bockting

Citations

  • 549 U.S. 406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that “plaintiffs did not factually establish a sufficient risk of future harm to support Article III standing” because the risk that misleading credit information would be disseminated to third parties was too speculative
  • “An advisory opinion results if the court resolves a question of law that is not presented by the facts of the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alito

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.