Whitworth v. Lowery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff must plead “‘sufficient factual matter, accepted as true,’ to permit ‘the reasonable inference’ that the relevant employees’ job content was ‘substantially equal’” (quoting Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678) (emphasis in original)
• holding that a discrimination complaint \must at a minimum assert nonconclusory factual matter sufficient to nudge[ ] [its] claims . . . across the line from conceivable to plausible to proceed . . . .\
• recognizing that “Swierkiewicz has continuing viability, as modified by Twombly and Iqbal”
• holding that the Twombly and Iqbal requirement ―that a complaint support the viability of its claims by pleading sufficient nonconclusory factual matter to set forth a claim that is plausible on its face‖ applies to employment discrimination claims
• holding that the Twombly and Iqbal requirement \that a complaint support the viability of its claims by pleading sufficient nonconclusory factual matter to set forth a claim that is plausible on its face\ applies to employment discrimination claims
• holding that the Twombly and Iqbal requirement ―that a complaint support the viability of its claims by pleading sufficient nonconclusory factual matter to set forth a claim that is plausible on its face‖ applies to employment discrimination claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).