District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/19/1995
Whittington v. State
Citations
- 656 So. 2d 1346
- 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6599
- 1995 WL 360670
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “a display of tattoos is not testimonial in nature,” and does not subject the defendant to cross-examination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benton, Ervin, Miner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-30· cited 3×
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-02-14· cited 1×
- Amended July 16, 2014 State of Iowa v. Jassimen N. DobbinsCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2014-03-12
- Rosario v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-25
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Walter T. BestNinth Circuit· 1978-03-31· cited 104×
- United States v. John Bacall, United States of America v. John Bacall Imports, Ltd.Ninth Circuit· 1971-07-28· cited 93×
- United States v. ValdiviaNinth Circuit· 1973-02-16· cited 41×
- United States v. Thaeeb BayNinth Circuit· 1985-06-12· cited 39×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-12· cited 21×
- MacIas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-11-05· cited 21×
- United States v. Richard J. HonigmanNinth Circuit· 1980-12-16· cited 12×
- Pettit v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-11· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.