Skip to main content
· 9/24/2010

Whittingham v. Whittingham

Citations

  • 67 So. 3d 239
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14188
  • 2010 WL 3718117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing child support order due to the court's failure to include any findings regarding the parties' incomes because such failure precluded a -4- determination as to whether the award was within the guidelines established in section 61.30
  • \[W]hen determining child support a trial court is required to make findings of fact regarding the incomes of the parties because such findings are required in order to determine whether the support award departs from the guidelines.\ (citing Wilcox, 35 So. 3d at 139)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whatley, Silberman, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.