Whitt v. City of Rockford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365(b
• explaining that the timing issue \is a real one especially when private parties are permitted by a federal agency to make major construction expenditures in advance of consideration of environmental issues\
• finding statutory scheme of review in court of appeals of Nuclear Regulatory Commission action to be inadequate in certain circumstances, and holding that district court has subject matter jurisdiction
• finding statutory scheme of review in court of appeals of Nuclear Regulatory Commission action to be inadequate in certain circumstances, and holding that district court has subject matter jurisdiction
• affirming dismissal and declining to remand because ordering a remand so that a complaint could be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) rather than Rule 12(b)(1) would have been a futile act
• rule of exhaustion of remedies does not bear upon subject matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).