Supreme Court of Arkansas· 10/18/1993
Whitson v. State
Citations
- 863 S.W.2d 794
- 314 Ark. 458
- 1993 Ark. LEXIS 569
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that HGN test in use for over 30 years
- finding officer’s testimony of HGN result “relevant as some proof of intoxication,” but implying that HGN test may not be used to quantify BAC
- Frye standard not used, holding that HGN test was not novel because of its use by law enforcement officials for over thirty-five years
- \testimony of the driver’s nystagmus is relevant for the limited purpose of generally indicating the presence of alcohol” and \the HGN test was not used to fix a percentage of blood alcohol content”
- \testimony of the driver's nystagmus is relevant for the limited purpose of generally indicating the presence of alcohol\ and \the HGN test was not used to fix a percentage of blood alcohol content\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-02-15· cited 266×
- People v. LeahyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-10-27· cited 195×
- State v. BaueNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-03-10· cited 124×
- People v. McKownIllinois Supreme Court· 2007-09-20· cited 95×
- State v. MurphyTennessee Supreme Court· 1997-10-13· cited 80×
- State v. BaityWashington Supreme Court· 2000-02-03· cited 75×
- Young v. City of BrookhavenMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-05-15· cited 66×
- City of Fargo v. McLaughlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-02-23· cited 60×
- Ayers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-09-17· cited 59×
- United States v. HornD. Maryland· 2002-01-31· cited 53×
- State v. MerrittConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-07-29· cited 52×
- Schultz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-08-31· cited 50×
- State v. ItoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1999-05-24· cited 46×
- State v. RoseMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-07-30· cited 43×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-18· cited 39×
- Ballard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1998-04-03· cited 38×
- State v. RuthardtSuperior Court of Delaware· 1996-03-21· cited 35×
- Massengale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-03-13· cited 28×
- State v. HelmsSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1998-08-05· cited 22×
- People v. BergerMichigan Court of Appeals· 1996-07-29· cited 19×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 185×
- Prater v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1991-11-11· cited 67×
- State v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court· 1988-10-07· cited 59×
- Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-02-01· cited 49×
- Parette v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-03-26· cited 38×
- Withers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-03-02· cited 23×
- Gustafson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1980-01-23· cited 20×
- People v. LoomisAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 1984-03-29· cited 18×
- Sutton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-01-11· cited 17×
- Horn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1984-03-19· cited 16×
- Orr v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-02-03· cited 14×
- Leshe v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1991-02-04· cited 14×
- Fitzpatrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1983-03-09· cited 14×
- Segerstrom v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-02-12· cited 14×
- White v. RaySupreme Court of Arkansas· 1979-11-13· cited 10×
- Middleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1989-10-11· cited 8×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1992-04-01· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.