Skip to main content

Whitson v. State

Citations

  • 863 S.W.2d 794
  • 314 Ark. 458
  • 1993 Ark. LEXIS 569

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that HGN test in use for over 30 years
  • finding officer’s testimony of HGN result “relevant as some proof of intoxication,” but implying that HGN test may not be used to quantify BAC
  • Frye standard not used, holding that HGN test was not novel because of its use by law enforcement officials for over thirty-five years
  • \testimony of the driver’s nystagmus is relevant for the limited purpose of generally indicating the presence of alcohol” and \the HGN test was not used to fix a percentage of blood alcohol content”
  • \testimony of the driver's nystagmus is relevant for the limited purpose of generally indicating the presence of alcohol\ and \the HGN test was not used to fix a percentage of blood alcohol content\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.