California Court of Appeal· 10/28/1958
Whitney v. Whitney
Citations
- 164 Cal. App. 2d 577
- 330 P.2d 947
- 1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 1646
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a trial court had the authority, pursuant to a minute order, to direct payment of permanent alimony commencing at a date earlier than the effective date of a decree of divorce
- providing that alimony proceeding can be closed for the welfare of a child
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wood (Fred B.)
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rubin v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-30· cited 139×
- Ex Parte BalogunSupreme Court of Alabama· 1987-10-02· cited 64×
- In Re Providian Credit Card CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-02-20· cited 57×
- In Re Marriage of JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-03-29· cited 48×
- Copeland v. CopelandSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2007-10-16· cited 32×
- Green v. UccelliCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-02-08· cited 32×
- Sundquist v. LechowickCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-08-07· cited 27×
- Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. Gourmet FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-07-15· cited 26×
- Raff v. RaffCalifornia Supreme Court· 1964-07-07· cited 24×
- Johanson v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court· 2008-05-01· cited 24×
- Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1965-04-14· cited 20×
- Brake v. Beech Aircraft Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1986-07-25· cited 15×
- Cardew v. CardewCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1961-05-25· cited 14×
- Lakenan v. LakenanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-12-04· cited 8×
- Stuart v. StuartCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-09-20· cited 5×
- Hecht v. HechtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-01-18· cited 4×
- Harris v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-12-10· cited 3×
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-07-09· cited 2×
- Schreiber v. SchreiberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-06-24· cited 1×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-01-31· cited 149×
- Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-03-21· cited 130×
- Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-04-12· cited 112×
- Howell v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-09-10· cited 83×
- Hall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-10-28· cited 59×
- Arnold v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-11-22· cited 45×
- Miller v. Highland Ditch Co.California Supreme Court· 1891-09-09· cited 35×
- Von Goerlitz v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1944-08-02· cited 31×
- Newbauer v. NewbauerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1949-12-12· cited 29×
- Simpson v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-06-29· cited 24×
- Winn v. WinnCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-07-17· cited 22×
- Pecarovich v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-09-29· cited 18×
- Slavich v. SlavichCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-12-28· cited 16×
- Barry v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-03-24· cited 15×
- Gaeta v. GaetaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-01-30· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.