Whitney-Kemmerer v. Kearns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee injured by his employer's misconduct may pursue common-law damages and a claim for workers' compensation
• holding that “[allowing a worker to receive workers’ compensation benefits in conjunction with common-law damages in no way constitutes a double recovery”
• holding that \[a]llowing a worker to receive workers' compensation benefits in conjunction with common-law damages in no way constitutes a double recovery\
• holding that an employee injured by his employer’s misconduct may pursue common-law damages and a claim for workers’ compensation
• holding plaintiffs' complaint alleging that employer \knew or should have known\ to be a \sufficient allegation of intentional misconduct\
• holding plaintiffs’ complaint alleging that employer “knew or should have known” to be a “sufficient allegation of intentional misconduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).