Skip to main content
· 5/29/1969

Whitney Investment Co. v. Westview Development Co.

Citations

  • 273 Cal. App. 2d 594
  • 78 Cal. Rptr. 302
  • 1969 Cal. App. LEXIS 2204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, “[wjhile a notice of termination or cancellation of a contract for breach need not be formal and explicit, it should clearly indicate to the defaulting party that the injured party considers the contract terminated”
  • “A breach does not terminate a contract as a matter of course but is a ground for termination at the option of the injured party”
  • “A breach does not terminate a contract as a matter of course but is a ground for termination at the option of the injured party.”
  • “A breach does not terminate a contract as a matter of course but is a ground for termination at the option of the injured party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamura

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.