Whitney-Fidalgo Seafoods, Inc. v. Beukers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exclusive remedy provision did not preclude suit against employer who knowingly hired employee in violation of child labor law, even though employee had received compensation benefits
• declining to address issue not addressed by trial court in case heard on petition for review
• declining to address issue not addressed by trial court in case heard on petition for review
• fact that illegally employed child passively accepted workers' compensation benefits does not indicate that valid election occurred
• no waiver of other rights without valid election to pursue remedy of workers' compensation
• laws prohibiting employment of children in occupations dangerous to life and limb are premised, in part, on the notion that children are not competent to assess the risks of personal injury and exploitation attendant in the performance of hazardous activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).