Whitney F. SHARPE; Mona E. Sharpe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FDIC, Receiver for Pioneer Bank, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that \FIRREA does not authorize the breach of contracts\ and it \also does not preempt state law so as to abrogate state contract rights\
• observing that \FIRREA does not authorize the breach of contracts\ and it \also does not preempt state law so as to abrogate state contract rights\
• holding the statutory bar on judicial review of the FDIC’s actions taken as a conservator or receiver “does not bar in-junctive relief when the FDIC has acted beyond, or contrary to, its statutorily prescribed, constitutionally permitted, powers or functions”
• holding the statutory bar on judicial review of the FDIC’s actions taken as a conservator or receiver “does not bar in-junctive relief when the FDIC has acted beyond, or contrary to, its statutorily prescribed, constitutionally permitted, powers or functions”
• holding the statutory bar on judicial review of the FDIC’s actions taken as a conservator or receiver “does not bar injunctive relief when the FDIC has acted beyond, or contrary 20 to, its statutorily prescribed, constitutionally permitted, powers or functions”
• holding the statutory bar on judicial review of the FDIC’s actions taken as a conservator or receiver “does not bar injunctive relief when the FDIC has acted beyond, or contrary 20 to, its statutorily prescribed, constitutionally permitted, powers or functions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).