Whitmore v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that order granting relief on rule 3.800(b)(2) motion was a nullity when it was entered two days after the permissible time period
• finding that an order granting a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion was a nullity because it was filed sixty-two days after the filing of the motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miran v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-29· cited 7×
• Pearce v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-16· cited 5×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-16· cited 4×
• Manning v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-15· cited 3×
• Moore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-12· cited 2×
• Rule v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-07· cited 2×
• De la Fuente v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-13· cited 2×
• MIRTO v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-06· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-17· cited 18×
• Buswell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-01· cited 3×