Whitman v. Watson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]f a claim could have been raised in a Rule 24.035 or Rule 29.15 motion but was not raised, the movant waives that claim”
• noting that a claim that could have been raised in a Rule 29.15 motion but was not cannot be raised in a petition for habeas corpus
• noting that a claim that could have been raised in a Rule 29.15 motion but was not cannot be raised in a petition for habeas corpus
• “Rule 30.03 permits a [post-conviction] movant, for good cause shown, to file a late notice of appeal within 12 months after judgment becomes final, if the movant receives leave of court to file out of time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).