Whitman v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the footnote from American Express doesn’t alter the requirement that plaintiffs show evidence of anticompetitive harm “in the market as a whole”
• applying a rule of reason analysis to an exclusive license because “the mere fact that an agreement implicates intellectual property rights does not ‘immunize [it] from antitrust attack’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).