Whitlock v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a trial court is justified in inferring that a defense counsel who is not called to testify would not have corroborated the acts and omissions that led to the alleged inadequate representation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Young v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1985-09-05· cited 35×
• Robinson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-05-28· cited 25×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Robertson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1974-12-19· cited 52×
• Lenoir v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1977-11-10· cited 31×
• Beard v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-12-04· cited 24×
• Herman v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1979-10-03· cited 21×
• Reynolds v. Ross County Children's Services Agency
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-05-18· cited 17×
• Howland v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-12-27· cited 11×
• Rensing v. Indiana State University Board of Trustees
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1982-06-16· cited 4×