Skip to main content

Whitley v. State

Citations

  • 140 Ark. 425
  • 215 S.W. 703
  • 1919 Ark. LEXIS 153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was “too late” to argue that an information charged separate offenses when the appellant raised no objection to the testimony “on the ground of variance” and noting that “[t]he information could have been amended or treated as amended to conform to the proof”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCulloch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.