Supreme Court of Arkansas· 11/10/1919
Whitley v. State
Citations
- 140 Ark. 425
- 215 S.W. 703
- 1919 Ark. LEXIS 153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it was “too late” to argue that an information charged separate offenses when the appellant raised no objection to the testimony “on the ground of variance” and noting that “[t]he information could have been amended or treated as amended to conform to the proof”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McCulloch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Winfrey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1918-03-11· cited 11×
- Rivard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1918-02-04· cited 7×
- Bond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1892-07-01· cited 3×
- Lacey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1918-09-30· cited 2×
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1919-06-02· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.