New Mexico Supreme Court· 6/25/1932
Whitley v. State
Citations
- 13 P.2d 423
- 36 N.M. 248
- 1932 NMSC 039
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Unless the 6 property in question is of such a nature that only expert testimony is competent, 7 non-experts with the requisite knowledge may testify as to its market value.” 8 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Biokdey, Watson, Sadler, Parker, Hudspeth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ZarafonetisNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-05-08· cited 38×
- Sturgeon v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1961-08-23· cited 38×
- State v. ParkerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1969-06-20· cited 33×
- State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-02-24· cited 27×
- State v. ClarksonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1938-02-04· cited 9×
- State v. PhillipsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1971-07-23· cited 7×
- Hicks v. MaestasNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1962-08-07· cited 3×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.