Whitley v. Piedmont Hospital, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that mere recitation that a breach of the standard of care caused the injury was overly conclusory without particulars
• holding that “the fact that an expert’s testimony may be contradictory goes only to the weight or credibility of the testimony and does not render it inadmissible”
• holding that “the fact that an expert’s testimony may be contradictory goes only to the weight or credibility of the testimony and does not render it inadmissible”
• affidavit that stated defendant breached the standard of care but stated no “ ‘particulars’ [was] not sufficient to rebut the motion for summary judgment”
• affidavit that stated defendant breached the standard of care but stated no “‘particulars’ [was] not sufficient to rebut the motion for summary judgment”
• determination of witness credibility is the jury's province

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).