· 1/10/2003
Whitley v. Chamouris
Citations
- 574 S.E.2d 251
- 265 Va. 9
- 19 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 824
- 2003 Va. LEXIS 15
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expert testimony not needed when malpractice action involves A case within a case @
- expert testimony not needed when malpractice action involves \case within a case\
- expert testimony not needed when malpractice action involves “case within a case”
- \a plaintiff must present sufficient evidence to convince the fact finder in the malpractice case that he would have prevailed in the underlying case absent the attorney's alleged negligence\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elizabeth B. Lacy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.