Whiting v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To the extent that a statute defining criminal liability remains ambiguous even after we subject it to recognized methods of statutory construction, we must resolve that ambiguity against the government.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. Prosecuting Attorney v. Bayer Corp.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2009-01-09· cited 15×
• Bochkovsky v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2015-08-28· cited 1×
• Elisey E. Martusheff v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2020-09-04

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Chaney
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1970-12-07· cited 600×
• Brookins v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-09-21· cited 26×
• Boeing Co. v. Department of Licensing
  Washington Supreme Court· 1985-01-11· cited 25×
• In Re Thompson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-03-21· cited 23×
• State v. ABC TOWING
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1998-02-20· cited 20×
• Ned v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2005-08-19· cited 20×
• McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc. v. McCauley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-08-31· cited 14×
• Magnuson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1992-12-31· cited 9×
• Wells v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2004-12-10· cited 7×
• Whitesides v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2004-04-02· cited 6×
• Linkus v. Maryland State Board of Heating Ventilation, Air-Conditioning & Refrigeration Contractors
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-02-28· cited 5×