Whiting v. Seavey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he law is well established that restrictive covenants in a deed as to use of property are distinct and separate from the provisions of a zoning law and have no influence or part in the administration of a zoning law”
• stating that \[t]he law is well established that restrictive covenants in a deed as to use of property are distinct and separate from the provisions of a zoning law and have no influence or part in the administration of a zoning law\
• affirming the decision of a 18 local board permitting an applicant to operate a boat yard despite the assertion of neighboring property owners that his doing so violated restrictive covenants in their deeds
• “Contractual restrictions in a deed are not abrogated or enlarged by zoning restrictions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).