Skip to main content
· 1/23/2024

Whiting v. Merrill Lynch & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • takings plaintiff has “heavy burden” of showing that compliance with local ordinances would be futile
  • considering contiguous parcels one unit unless landowner met burden showing that development plans for each would be zoned differently
  • “A police power regulation is not invalid simply because it prevents the highest and best use of the land.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Randolph D. Moss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.