· 1/23/2024
Whiting v. Merrill Lynch & Co.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- takings plaintiff has “heavy burden” of showing that compliance with local ordinances would be futile
- considering contiguous parcels one unit unless landowner met burden showing that development plans for each would be zoned differently
- “A police power regulation is not invalid simply because it prevents the highest and best use of the land.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Randolph D. Moss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.