Skip to main content
· 7/11/1893

Whiting Manufacturing Co. v. Gephart

Citations

  • 6 Wash. 615
  • 34 P. 161
  • 1893 Wash. LEXIS 349

Syllabus

<p>SALE — BILL OF SALE — RECORDING — RESCISSION.</p> <p>Under §1434, Gen. Stat., no sale of personal property is valid as against existing creditors or innocent purchasers, where the property is left in the possession of the vendor, unless such sale be evidenced by a memorandum in writing, and such memorandum be recorded in the auditor’s office of the county in which the property is situated within ten days after such sale.</p> <p>Where there has been an absolute delivery of goods under a contract of sale, thus resting title in the purchaser, and he has sold a portion of the goods, an agreement to return the remaining goods to the original owner does not amount to a rescission of the original contract of sale, but to a re-sale of the goods, and is void as to creditors, when there is no delivery of possession nor any bill of sale executed and recorded.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “ ‘The mere fact that residents and landowners will have to start paying city property taxes is not sufficient to show unreasonableness.’ ”
  • \'The mere fact that residents and landowners will have to start paying city property taxes is not sufficient to show unreasonableness.'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoyt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.