Whithlaw's Ex'or v. Sims
Citations
- 90 Va. 588
- 19 S.E. 113
- 1894 Va. LEXIS 28
Syllabus
<p>1. Wills — Undue influence. — The fact that the will of a person 88 years old differs from her previously expressed intention, and is made in favor of those standing in a relation of confidence and dependence toward her, raises a presumption of fraud and undue influence, which must be overcome by satisfactory testimony in order that the will may stand. Hartman v. Strickler, 82 Va., 238.</p> <p>2. Idem — Incapacity—Duress.—Opinions of witnesses long acquainted with testatrix, as to her mental incapacity and incompetency on account of bodily infirmity and duress, held, admissible as evidence in a suit to set aside the will, though they be not subscribing witnesses. Young v. Burner, 27 Gratt., 103.</p>
Judges: Lacy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Will of Amelia EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1910-09-21· cited 35×
- Redford v. BookerSupreme Court of Virginia· 1936-06-11· cited 34×
- Jenkins v. TriceSupreme Court of Virginia· 1929-03-21· cited 24×
- Culpepper v. RobieSupreme Court of Virginia· 1930-09-12· cited 24×
- Walton v. WaltonSupreme Court of Virginia· 1937-06-10· cited 24×
- Forehand v. SawyerSupreme Court of Virginia· 1927-01-20· cited 23×
- Parish v. ParishSupreme Court of Virginia· 2011-01-13· cited 7×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.