District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/21/2004
Whitfield v. State
Citations
- 864 So. 2d 562
- 2004 WL 86187
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] facially sufficient rule 3.800 motion to correct an illegal sentence must allege where and how the court records demonstrate entitlement to relief.” (citing Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998))
- affirming a trial court's order denying a rule 3.800(a
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wolf
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Burchfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-21· cited 12×
- Petscher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-23· cited 6×
- Nieves v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-24· cited 2×
- Zeigler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-19· cited 1×
- Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-22
- Bergman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-19
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.