Whitfield v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he DNA evidence when considered with the additional circumstantial evidence adduced at trial was sufficient evidence to support [the defendant’s] convictions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Howard v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-06-27· cited 52×
• Carl Dausch v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-06-12· cited 19×
• Witcher v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2010-04-29· cited 8×
• State v. Kromah
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-02-24· cited 6×
• Slocum v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2013-10-10· cited 4×
• Carter v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2015-02-26· cited 4×
• Hall v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2013-12-05· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Prater v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1991-11-11· cited 67×
• Burmingham v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-09-21· cited 57×
• Engram v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-05-04· cited 36×
• Wilson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-02-26· cited 29×
• Russey v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-02-18· cited 13×
• Stewart v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-02-12· cited 6×