Skip to main content
· 3/12/1999

Whitfield v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 39 F. Supp. 2d 434
  • 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 599
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3582
  • 1999 WL 171217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating previous decision insofar as it held plaintiff not actually disabled
  • jury could reasonably conclude that inability to bend repeti tively constitutes substantial limitation on ability to bend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.