Fifth Circuit· 10/14/1988
Whitfield v. Lindemann
Citations
- 853 F.2d 1298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that appraisal accounted for projected future losses so they could not be recovered a second time
- “Had the properties been evaluated properly when they were transferred, the same operating losses would have occurred. To allow recovery for. those losses ... is to place the Plan in a better position than it would have occupied had the wrong not occurred.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Krim v. pcOrder.com, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2005-03-01· cited 145×
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISAS.D. Texas· 2003-10-16· cited 114×
- Thomas Perez, Secretary v. Herbert BruisterFifth Circuit· 2016-05-03· cited 53×
- Florida Department of Insurance v. Chase Bank of Texas National Ass'nFifth Circuit· 2001-11-30· cited 46×
- Coxson v. Commonwealth Mortgage Co. of America, L.P.Fifth Circuit· 1995-01-26· cited 22×
- Capital District Physician's Health Plan v. O'HigginsN.D. New York· 1996-09-11· cited 7×
- Craft v. Sunwest Bank of Albuquerque, N.A.D. New Mexico· 1999-11-17· cited 5×
- Harry J. Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.Second Circuit· 1992-08-31· cited 3×
- Allison v. Bank One - DenverTenth Circuit· 2002-05-15· cited 1×
- Reich v. StreetD. New Hampshire· 1993-11-19
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 3,317×
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 1,450×
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-08-28· cited 573×
- Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-18· cited 546×
- Huddleston v. Herman & MacLeanFifth Circuit· 1981-03-09· cited 367×
- Charles W. Leigh and Ervin F. Dusek, Etc., and George Johnson, Intervening v. Clyde William EngleSeventh Circuit· 1984-03-20· cited 306×
- 15 Fair empl.prac.cas. 827, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7842 Patrick James v. Stockham Valves and Fittings Co.Fifth Circuit· 1977-11-18· cited 301×
- Katsaros v. CodySecond Circuit· 1984-06-29· cited 277×
- Blau v. LehmanSupreme Court· 1962-01-22· cited 271×
- William E. Brock, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor v. Kenneth Hendershott and Edgar PlatelSixth Circuit· 1988-02-24· cited 130×
- Duckett v. National Mechanics' BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1897-12-01· cited 117×
- Ruth M. Sargeant v. Alexander E. Sharp, IIFirst Circuit· 1978-05-16· cited 107×
- Yeseta v. BaimaNinth Circuit· 1988-01-15· cited 104×
- Freeport Sulphur Company v. The S/s Hermosa, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Furniture, Etc., in Rem, Pansuiza Compania De Navigacion S.A., in PersonamFifth Circuit· 1976-04-30· cited 95×
- Lowen v. Tower Asset Management, Inc.Second Circuit· 1987-09-17· cited 80×
- City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 80×
- Bricklayers' Pension Trust Fund v. TaiariolSixth Circuit· 1982-03-09· cited 73×
- Robert S. Fremont and Henry W. Dybal v. McGraw Company, Robert S. Fremont, Ronald L. McCarthy and Henry W. Dybal v. McGraw CompanySeventh Circuit· 1979-10-31· cited 59×
- Brandt v. GroundsSeventh Circuit· 1982-07-06· cited 58×
- Foltz v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc.District of Columbia· 1986-01-15· cited 51×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.