Whitfield v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford
Citations
- 205 U.S. 489
- 27 S. Ct. 578
- 51 L. Ed. 895
- 1907 U.S. LEXIS 1372
Syllabus
<p>If an insurance company does business in a State it must do so subject to such valid regulations as the State adopts.</p> <p>A State may adopt such public policy as it deems best, provided it does not in so doing come into conflict with the Federal Constitution; and if con,stitutional the legislative will must be respected, even though the courts be of opinion that the statute is unwise.</p> <p>The statute of Missouri, that suicide, unless contemplated when the policy was applied for, shall be no defense to actions on policies of life insurance, is a legitimate exercise of the power of the State; and- a stipulation in a policy, that the company shall only be liable for a portion of the amount in case of suicide, not contemplated when the policy was applied for, is void, and cannot be set up as a defense.</p> <p>' Whatever tends to diminish a plaintiff’s cause of action or to defeat recovery in whole or in part amounts in law to a defense.</p> <p>144 Fed. Rep. 356, reversed.</p>
Judges: Harlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.