Whitehouse v. Lead Industries Assocation, Inc. 99-5226 (2002)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Commerce's reasonable application of AFA to infer countervailability as to a particular program in a prior proceeding with Commerce's improper use of AFA to make \sweeping legal conclusion[s] lacking any factual foundation\ in the determination under review
• “[A]ny confusion [based on the Commerce questionnaire] should have been addressed by seeking guidance from Commerce, rather than categorically withholding the information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).