Whitehead v. Lane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where counsel did not receive notice of trial date, defendant and his counsel were continually available for trial and continuance should not have been charged to defendant for purposes of speedy trial
• finding defendant rebutted the presumption by presenting evidence in the 7 form of sworn testimony from counsel and bondsperson that they did not receive notice from the clerk

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).